Don't
expect to find little new here. After reading or simply consulting other
similar guides and essays about the same topic, I can state this probably
rightly claims the palm of most in-depth and updated one, often giving
details absolutely unknown or misknown by journalists, fans or even
other critics. For example did you know that in origin the Stones placed
lots of emphasis about the fact they were a Rhythm and Blues band, not
a Rock 'n' roll one, indeed the greatest as they intrduced themselves
later in the 70's? Or that Wyman's true family name is completely different
or that the Beatles had worse contracts than Jagger's gang? Or more,
the story behind the lapping tongue symbol?
This book offers a wide gamut of topics briefly divided in 3 main categories
analyzed throughout time (The story, The songs, The scandals), explaining
the purport of the phenomenon, later only equalled by the explosion
of Punk. But Punk and Emocore are dead... In addition, the Stones are
still touring and they don't want to leave Deep Purple steal their sceptre.
The breaking of some commercial rules considered to be a suicide turned
out to be smart, fresh and successful ideas, helping the scene to regenerate
itself and wiping out previous stagnant patterns, at the same time pioneering
much of what mattered in music business during the following two decades.
For a fan there're hours to spend enjoying the behind-the-scenes that
dealt with recording sessions, legal troubles, love affairs, management
relationships, decisions, nuisances, cultural influence and so on. The
Rolling Stones are clearly more than a legendary band: they were and
are a lifestyle still unmatched; they made up rock stardom with a bit
of luck and most of all a very sharp sensitiveness for deciphering what
people wanted and liked at any historical time; this goes beyond artistic
prostitution: this is mind-reading psychology at its highest levels
and mainly comes from the members and not the managers or experts surrounding
them.
Although I would've preferred a more comfortable A4 format for storing,
my opinion about the contents - of course generous with photos and curiosities
as a vivid book has to contain - remains unchanged: if you wish to invest
your money on one guide, then acquiring the present one may reveal a
well-guessed choice, avoiding the unpleasant feeling of 'something lacking'
that unavoidably leads to a further purchase sooner or later; that's
why I feel like recommending in particular the following books as well
from the same publishing company: the Beatles, Heavy Metal, Pink Floyd,
Punk and Rock (but there are other 15 covering the rest of music genres
for those who concern).
More than a standard guide, this proves to be a printed documentary
for maniacs desiring to learn about unreleased tracks and much more,
an analogic movie to bring with during a holiday for the most, or a
vital reference to look up in in order to better contextualize what
brought to birth the lyrics and the attitude composing their major classics,
such as "Jumpin' Jack Flash", "Paint it Black",
"Angie" or "Brown Sugar", just as
one does with a painter, a sculpturer or a director, die-hard fans speaking.
After a physiological decline in the 80s, the Stones of the 21st century
still seem far from the image of a typical retired, serene and society
respectful grandpa. Of course you can't compare the British lords to
their more extreme spawn (Alice Cooper, Kiss, Black Sabbath, Marylin
Manson, Deicide, Burzum, Berzerker?), instead ask yourself the right
question: are they going to be there in 10 years? Will they be remembered
as much as them? Think about it: when even your (grand)parents know
the name of a real Rock band, when this band hasn't become the riduculous
shade of itself and when even national media dedicate them services,
then it means they have become as important as Madonna, Michael Jackson
or Shakira. But the big difference is that...(merely summarized in a
Beavis & Buttheadian manner) the latter suck!
MARKUS GANZHERRLICH - 20th August 2006